Petitioners in Shutesbury call for input on library site

By SCOTT MERZBACH

Staff Writer

Published: 04-05-2023 7:59 PM

SHUTESBURY — A petition filed by 21 Shutesbury residents is requiring town officials to create a Public Involvement Plan by mid-April for 66 Leverett Road, the planned location for a new town library where oil and other hazardous materials have been identified.

Town officials announced this week that a virtual Select Board meeting April 12 at 6 p.m. will present the draft Public Involvement Plan, solicit public comment on the plan and provide information about disposal site conditions. The draft plan will be posted on the town website, shutesbury.org, in advance of the meeting.

Under state law, the town is mandated to establish a Public Involvement Plan when a petition signed by 10 or more residents is submitted after a site receives a tier classification under the state Department of Environmental Protection’s waste site cleanup program.

As a Tier 1 site, the property is already going through the comprehensive phased Massachusetts Contingency Plan cleanup process. Fuss & O’Neill Inc. is undertaking response actions for the town.

In this case, the Select Board received a petition from resident Amanda Alix, signed by 20 other residents, asking for the PIP on the Leverett Road site, also known as Lot O-32.

Hazardous materials have been detected on the property through multiple groundwater monitoring wells, including Thallium, Antimony and 2-Methylnapthalene and oil, or volatile petroleum hydrocarbons, like C5-C8 Aliphatics.

The area where the reportable conditions for the volatile petroleum hydrocarbons were identified had been leased by the U.S. Air Force and operated as the Shutesbury-Westover Remote Site between 1957 and 1967. The specific soil sample was collected in the vicinity of a historic gasoline underground storage tank, removed by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers in 1994, that was used to power an emergency generator for the remote site.

On Feb. 28, Select Board Chairwoman Rita Farrell responded to the petition by Alix, noting that a tier classification report had been filed with the DEP by Fuss & O’Neill in January.

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

Amherst councilors accused of racism, disrespect over heated meeting on cease-fire
Yankee Candle settles $1.2M class action lawsuit over time clock rounding
UMass basketball: Josh Cohen, Robert Davis Jr. first Minutemen to enter transfer portal
Reimagining the Hampshire Mall: UMass architecture students share their visions
Hadley nearing settlement over campers dispute along Connecticut River
Longtime employees buy Kitchen Garden Farm in Sunderland

“We appreciate your concern for the environmental health of Lot O-32,” Farrell writes. “The town is also very concerned.”

Farrell notes steps that Fuss & O’Neill, as the licensed site professional, is taking, including trying to define the limits of any potential contaminants at the Westover remote site and recommendation steps needed.

Library Director Mary Ann Antonellis said the gasoline release is at the south end of the property near the former air force radio tower. “It has no impact on the library project which is at the north end of the property,” Anotnellis said.

On March 13, Matthew Kissane, a senior geologist at Fuss & O’Neill, informed the state of an amended report of the reportbale concentrated groundwater, or RCGW: “The two heavy metals that exceeded their respective RCGW-1 criteria during the December 2, 2022 and January 11, 2023, groundwater monitoring events were Thallium and Antimony, respectively,” Kissane wrote.

In a Feb. 17 letter, Kissane recommend quarterly monitoring.

“Based upon the results of subsequent groundwater monitoring events at the site, it may be prudent to install one or more additional wells in the vicinity of the currently identified petroleum release area, in order to better define the nature and extent of the impacted groundwater and evaluate potential fluctuations in groundwater flow patterns.”

DEP spells out the process for the PIP.

Within 60 calendar days of responding to the petitioners, a draft Public Involvement Plan must be prepared and presented at a public meeting, along with an update on the status of the site.

All comments received must be reviewed, considered and responded to.

“The Plan must then be finalized and implemented throughout the remainder of the cleanup process.”

Scott Merzbach can be reached at smerzbach@gazettenet.com.]]>